Building Tolerance for Backsliding by Trash-Talking Democracy: Theory and Evidence From Mexico


Journal article


Lautaro Cella, Ipek Çinar, Susan Stokes, Andres Uribe
Comparative Political Studies, First published online March 20, 2025

DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00104140251328024

View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Cella, L., Çinar, I., Stokes, S., & Uribe, A. (2025). Building Tolerance for Backsliding by Trash-Talking Democracy: Theory and Evidence From Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, (First published online March 20). https://doi.org/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00104140251328024


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Cella, Lautaro, Ipek Çinar, Susan Stokes, and Andres Uribe. “Building Tolerance for Backsliding by Trash-Talking Democracy: Theory and Evidence From Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies, no. First published online March 20 (2025).


MLA   Click to copy
Cella, Lautaro, et al. “Building Tolerance for Backsliding by Trash-Talking Democracy: Theory and Evidence From Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies, no. First published online March 20, 2025, doi:https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00104140251328024.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{lautaro2025a,
  title = {Building Tolerance for Backsliding by Trash-Talking Democracy: Theory and Evidence From Mexico},
  year = {2025},
  issue = {First published online March 20},
  journal = {Comparative Political Studies},
  doi = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00104140251328024},
  author = {Cella, Lautaro and Çinar, Ipek and Stokes, Susan and Uribe, Andres}
}

Abstract

Leaders who seek to build public toleration for democratic backsliding have a little-noticed strategy at their disposal: degrading their democracies in the eyes of their citizens. If voters can be induced to believe that their democracy is already broken, then nothing of value is lost when leaders attack the courts, vilify the press, or undermine confidence in elections. We call this strategy trash-talking democracy, and study it in the context of contemporary Mexico. We use text-as-data methods to show that President Andrés Manuel López Obrador spent more time trash-talking his democracy than he did deepening partisan polarization. With a survey experiment we show that exposure to López Obrador’s trash-talking of the courts elicits anti-democratic attitudes among Mexicans — both among his supporters and among supporters of the opposition. Strategies to resist backsliding should include not just efforts at de-polarization but also at restoring confidence in democratic institutions.